About Us

Party of Women (Wo)Manifesto​

​

Justice

We believe in a justice system that serves the people—not political ideologies, activist agendas, or institutional cowardice.

Across the UK, ordinary citizens, campaigners, whistleblowers, and journalists are being dragged through the courts for speaking the truth. Women are criminalised for defending their boundaries. Journalists are imprisoned for exposing child sexual abuse. Protesters are arrested for holding a sign. This is lawfare—where process becomes punishment.

Our legal system has been captured. The language of law has been distorted. Biological reality is ignored. Dissent is punished, while public institutions evade scrutiny.

We are committed to restoring fairness, integrity, and reality in British law.

The Party of Women will:

• Defend freedom of speech, especially political, journalistic, and protest speech.

• End political prosecutions and expose the misuse of public institutions to silence opposition.

• Reform legal aid and defamation law to protect whistleblowers and those facing ideologically motivated legal harassment.

• Create real protections for citizen journalists and campaigners who expose abuse or corruption.

• Hold public officials accountable when they abuse the legal system to deflect from their own failures.

Justice must be rooted in truth—not ideology.
The law must protect women—not punish them.
We will stand for those who speak up, even when the state turns against them.

​

​

We Stand for Truthful Language

Clear, honest, and reality-based language is the foundation of a fair and functioning society. Without it, we cannot defend rights, protect the vulnerable, or make good law.

We will:

• Eradicate ideological and nonsensical language from all government departments, legislation, and public services.

• Ban the use of terms like “assigned at birth,” “cisgender,” “chestfeeding,” and other invented language that distorts biological truth.

• Require all public institutions to use plain, truthful language based on sex — not gender ideology.

• Restore the use of words such as woman, mother, girl, and female where they have been replaced or erased.

The public deserves clarity, not confusion. We will end the misuse of language that obscures reality and enables harm.

​

​

Repeal the Gender Recognition Act (GRA)

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 enables individuals to legally change the sex marker on their birth certificate. This legal fiction has been used to erase women’s boundaries, disrupt sex-based services, and confuse public policy.

We will:

• Repeal the Gender Recognition Act in full.

• End the legal recognition of “gender identity”.

• Ensure all laws and official records are based on biological sex only.

• Protect women’s rights to single-sex spaces, services, and opportunities — with no exceptions.

​

​

Repeal the Equality Act 2010

The Equality Act 2010 has been used to smuggle "gender ideology" into every corner of public life — from schools to healthcare to prisons. It has erased the meaning of sex, silenced women, and elevated identity over material reality.

We believe this Act does more harm than good. It is not fit for purpose.

We will:

• Fully repeal the Equality Act 2010.

• Remove “gender reassignment” and other ideological concepts from legal protection.

• Replace the Act with new legislation that defends sex-based rights, free speech, and material reality.

• Ensure that no law compels the public or professionals to lie about sex.

​​

​​

Withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

The ECHR has become a tool for imposing ideological interpretations of “rights” that conflict with national sovereignty and women’s protections.

We will:

• Withdraw the UK from the ECHR.

• End the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights over UK law.

• Introduce a British Bill of Rights that defends truth, free speech, and sex-based protections for women and children.

• Restore full democratic control over our laws, language, and public life.

​

​

Migration and the Safety of Women and Girls

Migration policy must be shaped by truth, transparency, and responsibility — and must never overlook the safety of women and girls.

We will:

• Ensure that all decisions around immigration and asylum take into account the impact on women’s safety, particularly in housing, services, and public spaces.

• End the practice of housing single men with women and children in asylum or migrant accommodation.

• Require full sex-disaggregated data on migrants and asylum seekers.

• Prioritise female-centred safeguarding in all public policy related to migration and border control.

A country that cannot protect its women is failing. We will make women’s safety a central consideration in every immigration decision.

​

​

Justice for Grooming Gang Victims

For decades, organised grooming gangs have operated across the UK, preying on vulnerable girls — while authorities looked the other way. The Party of Women demands full justice for every survivor and full accountability for every perpetrator and enabler.

- We will advocate for full criminal investigations into every individual involved in these crimes — from the rapists themselves to those who enabled or covered up their actions.
- This includes accomplices, police officers, councillors, social workers, care workers, and teachers who failed to act or protected perpetrators.
- We will seek the prosecution of those who betrayed their public duty and left children to suffer in silence.
- We will campaign for a statutory inquiry with powers to compel evidence and testimony.
- We will ensure victim support and protection is placed at the heart of policy, not political correctness.

Justice must be done — and seen to be done. No more silence. No more excuses.

 

​

Support for Mothers and Young Children

The Party of Women believes that women should have a genuine choice to raise their young children at home without being economically penalised or socially pressured.

Children deserve stability. Mothers deserve dignity. We will build a society that supports both.

Many women today feel forced to return to work when their children are still very young — not because they want to, but because they cannot afford not to. This is a profound social failure.

The Party of Women believes that families should be supported to make the right decisions for their children — including the ability for mothers to stay at home during the early years if they choose to.

- We will seek a long-term **resolution to the economic pressures** that force women back into work during their babies' formative years.
- We will explore **tax reforms, family allowances, and maternity support** models that empower parental choice.
- We will work to **shift cultural and policy attitudes** to recognise motherhood as socially and economically vital.
- We will ensure that no woman has to choose between bonding with her baby and financial survival.

A truly compassionate society supports mothers — not just in words, but in policy and practice.

​

Parental Rights and Responsibility

The Party of Women affirms that parents are the primary, lawful, and morally responsible guardians of their children. The state does not replace parents. Institutions do not outrank families. Professionals do not supersede parental authority except in cases of genuine abuse or neglect.

Children do not belong to the state. They belong to their families.

Parental rights are inseparable from parental responsibility. Any system that undermines parents while holding them legally liable for outcomes is unjust and incoherent.

​

Parents’ Right to Know What Is Taught in Schools

Parents cannot protect, guide, or raise their children if they are deliberately kept in the dark.

We will establish an absolute right for parents to transparency in education.

We will:

• Require schools to fully disclose all curriculum content, materials, external providers, and teaching resources.

• Guarantee parents advance notice of any teaching related to sex, relationships, identity, sexuality, religion, or political ideology.

• Restore a clear and enforceable parental right to withdraw children from any content that conflicts with parental values or safeguarding concerns.

• Prohibit schools from withholding information from parents about what their children are taught under the guise of “confidentiality” or “child autonomy”.

• End the use of ideological frameworks in schools that encourage children to view parents as obstacles, risks, or enemies.

Schools exist to educate children—not to undermine families.

​

Legal Responsibility Requires Legal Authority

Parents are legally responsible for their children’s welfare, safety, and outcomes. That responsibility must be matched with real authority and access to information.

We will:

• Affirm in law that parents are the default decision-makers for all non-emergency matters involving their children.

• End institutional practices that treat parents as optional or secondary in decisions affecting their child.

• Ensure that no public body can override parental authority without clear legal justification, evidence of harm, and due process.

If parents are responsible, parents must be respected.

​

The Problem with Gillick Competence

The doctrine of “Gillick competence” has been expanded far beyond its original intent and is now routinely used to sideline parents, particularly mothers, from decisions with permanent consequences for their children.

It has become a tool for secrecy, not safeguarding.

We will:

• Review and fundamentally reform the use of Gillick competence in law, medicine, and education.

• End its use to justify withholding information from parents about their child’s wellbeing, beliefs, or medical interactions.

• Prohibit its application in cases involving:

  • Sexual identity or gender ideology

  • Medical or psychological intervention

  • Sexual health services

  • Any decision with long-term or irreversible consequences

• Reassert that capacity does not erase dependency, and that children require parental guidance even when they can express views.

Children need protection, not premature autonomy imposed by institutions.

​

Medical Ethics, Consent, and Parental Involvement

Medical professionals exist to treat patients—not to replace parents.

We will set clear legal boundaries on what medics may do, decide, or discuss with children without parental knowledge or consent.

We will:

• Require parental knowledge and consent for all non-emergency medical, psychological, and therapeutic interventions involving minors.

• Prohibit medical professionals from:

  • Providing ideological counselling or identity-based interventions without parental involvement.

  • Encouraging children to conceal information from parents.

  • Making life-altering decisions without parental consent.

• Limit confidential medical contact with minors to genuine emergencies or immediate safeguarding risks, with strict oversight.

• Ensure that all medical records relating to a child are fully accessible to parents.

 

Safeguarding cannot operate in secrecy.

Professional Contact with Children Without Parents

The unchecked expansion of institutional access to children—without parental knowledge—has eroded trust and accountability.

We will:

• Strictly limit when teachers, counsellors, medics, or external professionals may have private or confidential contact with children.

• Require parental notification and consent for:

  • One-to-one counselling

  • External speakers or workshops

  • Psychological or identity-related discussions

• Establish clear penalties for institutions that deliberately bypass parents without lawful cause.

No adult has a greater claim to a child than their parent.

​

Restoring Parental Authority: Reform of Gillick Competence and the Fraser Guidelines

The Party of Women recognises parents as the primary, lawful guardians of their children. Parental responsibility is not symbolic — it carries legal, moral, and lifelong consequences. Any framework that erodes parental authority while leaving responsibility intact is unjust and dangerous.

Two legal doctrines — Gillick competence and the Fraser Guidelines — were created for narrow, exceptional medical circumstances. Over time, they have been expanded far beyond their original purpose. This mission creep has systematically undermined parental rights, normalised secrecy, and weakened safeguarding.

This must be corrected.

​

What Gillick and Fraser Were Intended to Do

Gillick competence was introduced in 1985 to allow a limited exception to parental consent in medical treatment — where a child under 16 demonstrates sufficient understanding of a specific medical decision.

The Fraser Guidelines were developed alongside Gillick to address one very narrow issue only: the provision of contraception to under-16s in exceptional circumstances where parental involvement could not be secured.

Neither doctrine was intended to:

• Replace parents as decision-makers

• Establish child autonomy over parents

• Justify secrecy as standard practice

• Apply to education, identity, belief systems, or long-term medical pathways

Both assumed parental involvement as the norm.

 

How Mission Creep Has Undermined Parents

Over time, Gillick and Fraser have been stretched beyond recognition. What was intended as a safeguard has become a mechanism for bypassing parents entirely.

They are now routinely used to:

• Withhold information from parents

• Justify medical or psychological interventions without consent

• Encourage secrecy between children and institutions

• Treat children as independent rights-holders in opposition to their families

• Override parental objections as a matter of policy

This expansion has occurred without democratic mandate, without legislation, and without proper scrutiny.

The result is a system in which parents remain legally responsible for their children — yet are excluded from decisions with permanent consequences.

This is not safeguarding. It is institutional overreach.

​

The Party of Women Will Reform Gillick and Fraser

We will re-examine and legislate to restore these doctrines to their original, limited scope, with parental rights and safeguarding at the centre.

We will:

• End the routine use of Gillick competence to bypass parents in non-emergency situations.

• Restrict Gillick competence to short-term, reversible medical decisions, assessed on a genuinely case-by-case basis.

• Prohibit the use of Gillick or Fraser to justify secrecy from parents.

• Explicitly exclude their use in decisions involving:

  • Identity or belief systems

  • Psychological or psychiatric intervention

  • Medical pathways with long-term or irreversible consequences

• Require documented efforts to involve parents in all cases.

• Ensure that parental consent is the default legal requirement, not an obstacle to be managed.

 

Ending Secrecy and Restoring Safeguarding

Safeguarding works with parents, not against them.

We will:

• Ban institutional policies that encourage children to conceal information from their parents.

• Require full parental access to medical and welfare records relating to their child.

• Impose clear accountability where professionals or institutions deliberately exclude parents without lawful justification.

• Reinforce that capacity does not negate dependency — children need guidance, not premature autonomy imposed by institutions.

​

​

Freedom from Religious Coercion: Ban the Niqab

The Party of Women rejects practices that imprison women—physically, psychologically, or socially—under the guise of culture or religion.

The niqab is not a symbol of freedom. It is a barrier to participation, identity, safety, and equality. It erases women from public life and enforces female submission through fabric.

No woman can be equal when she is required to hide her face to exist in public.

We will:

• Ban the niqab in all public spaces, including streets, public transport, schools, universities, hospitals, courts, and government buildings.

• Recognise full facial covering as incompatible with women’s equality, safeguarding, and social cohesion.

• Ensure women are not pressured, coerced, or intimidated into covering by family, community, or religious authority.

• Support women who wish to leave coercive religious environments, including access to housing, legal protection, and specialist support services.

Women must be visible to be equal. A society that tolerates female erasure is not a free society.

​

​

Restoring Public Institutions: End Ideological Capture

Britain’s core public institutions have been hollowed out by ideological capture—whether religious, political, or activist. This has undermined trust, professionalism, and basic function.

The NHS, police, and schools exist to serve the public—not to enforce belief systems.

We will restore these institutions to reality-based, evidence-led, and secular standards.

​

​

The NHS

Patients deserve medical care grounded in biological reality, clinical evidence, and safeguarding—not ideology.

We will:

• Remove all ideological frameworks from NHS policy, training, and practice.

• End the medicalisation of gender ideology, particularly where it harms women and children.

• Restore sex-based data collection across all health services.

• Ensure women’s healthcare is protected, prioritised, and not diluted or redefined.

​

Policing

The police exist to uphold the law impartially—not to police speech or protect ideology.

We will:

• End ideological training and operational guidance that compromises impartial policing.

• Refocus policing on violent crime, sexual crime, exploitation, and public safety.

• Protect officers who refuse to enforce unlawful or ideological directives.

• Restore public confidence by ensuring the law is applied equally, without fear or favour.

 

Education

Schools exist to educate—not indoctrinate.

We will:

• Remove ideological teaching from all state-funded education.

• Ensure biology, sex, and reality-based science are taught clearly and honestly.

• End external activist influence in schools.

• Protect children from religious or ideological coercion that restricts their development, freedom, or education.

Public institutions must serve the people—not reprogram them.

​

​

Ban Cousin Marriage: Protect Women and Children

Cousin marriage is not a harmless cultural tradition. It is a practice with documented links to genetic harm, social control, and the subordination of women.

It traps women within closed family systems, restricts choice, and increases the risk of serious congenital disabilities in children.

The Party of Women places the welfare of women and children above cultural relativism.

We will:

• Ban first-cousin marriage in the UK.

• Launch public education campaigns on the genetic risks associated with close-kin marriage.

• Recognise cousin marriage as a safeguarding issue, particularly for girls and young women.

• Protect women and girls from familial pressure, coercion, or forced marriage.

• Ensure support services are available for those seeking to escape controlling family structures.

Women are not property to be exchanged within bloodlines. Children should not be born into preventable harm.

​

​

One Standard, One Law

The Party of Women believes in equal rights, equal protections, and equal responsibilities under the law.

There will be no parallel legal systems, no cultural exemptions, and no special pleading.

We will:

• Enforce one secular legal standard for all who live in the UK.

• Reject the idea that women’s rights are negotiable based on culture or belief.

• Ensure that safeguarding, equality, and freedom apply to every woman—without exception.

A society that compromises on women’s rights is not tolerant. It is cowardly.

​

​

Our Vision

• A society that respects truth and speaks plainly.

• Women and girls protected by law — not redefined out of existence.

• Public services that are honest, functional, and free from ideology.

• A country that governs itself, protects its own, and tells the truth.

​

​

Party of Women — Dare to Be Honest

We are the only political party that will say what everyone knows to be true:
Men cannot become women. Words have meaning. Biology is not bigotry.

We will repeal harmful legislation, restore legal and linguistic clarity, and put women’s rights, safety, and language back at the heart of British law and life.

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​